Monday, October 31, 2011

'I will ensure that Raja goes to jail for 21 years' - Swamy


The sceptic may find this complex transaction difficult to prove but Swamy is oozing with confidence. He says, "I will not leave the case half-way. I will ensure that Raja goes to jail for 21 years."

He alleges that Raja gave that licence to Swan Telecom and as a result of this the Karunanidhi family firm got a loan.

Swamy's main contention is that Raja changed 'the cut off date' in the process of allotting spectrum and helped Anil Ambani's Reliance which had a 9.97 percent stake in Swan and the Tata group, which eventually sold shares to Docomo and made profits.

Swan has now been renamed as Etisalat DB and Unitech, which also got cheap spectrum, sold it to Telinor, which now operates in India under the name Uninor.

Once Swamy got the above facts and related papers he took up the case.

In November, 2008, Dr Swamy wrote to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and followed it up with four more letters seeking sanction to prosecute Raja.

When the prime minister didn't take any decision, Swamy went to Supreme Court and the rest is history. Even advocate Prashant Bhushan filed another petition to create a monitoring mechanism to supervise CBI's investigation of the 2G case.


Image: Former Telecom Ministry A Raja


http://www.rediff.com/news/slide-show/slide-show-1-subramanian-swamy-speaks/20110211.htm

'I will implicate Sonia Gandhi in the 2G case' - Swamy

Sheela Bhatt in New Delhi

"Just wait and see. Halfway through 2-G spectrum case I will bring in Sonia Gandhi into it. Nothing is going to go wrong in this case. This case is going to make a modern, new and clean India," claims Janata Party president Dr Subramanian Swamy, one of the petitioners in the 2G spectrum scam, which is being investigated by the Central Bureau of Investigation under the Supreme Court's supervision.

As the Supreme Court's pressure on the CBI mounts, Dr Swamy feels the thrill of success.

After former telecom minister A Raja's arrest, Swamy is now targeting Raja's mentor and Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam chief and Tamil Nadu Chief Minister K Karunanidhi.

Swamy claimed to rediff.com that Karunanidhi is a worried man now.

Swami and now even the CBI's case is that Raja favoured Swan Telecom to get the 2-G spectrum at a low price. Businessman Shahid Balwa, who was arrested on Wednesday, was a promoter of Swan. Etisalat Dynamix Balwa, which purchased shares of Swan, is also the front company of Balwa. He also launched another company which reportedly gave a loan to a television company ran by Karunanidhi's family. This nexus and sequence of money passing hands is being established by the CBI.



http://www.rediff.com/news/slide-show/slide-show-1-subramanian-swamy-speaks/20110211.htm

'A boon for terrorists across the border' - Swamy's FIR against Sonia


Swamy went on to say, "One can safely conclude that the script writers of this bill are themselves blinded with religious biases. In India communal violence happens mostly because of politico-communal reasons. In many instances, as documented by several commissions of inquiry, it is the so-called minority group that triggers the trouble. We hence need laws that can prevent such violence irrespective of whoever perpetrates it. To argue that since the administration is always biased in favour of the dominant group we need acts that are biased in favour of the non-dominant group is imprudent and puerile."

"The present draft bill will only promote disharmony. With these kind of laws the LeTs (Lashkar-e-Tayiba) and HuJIs (Harkat-ul-Jihadi Islami) across the border need not have to promote terrorism in our territory anymore. All that they need to do is to encourage a minor communal riot and they can achieve what they want -- huge rift between the majority and minority communities," he added.

"Hence, the NAC, with Sonia Gandhi as chairperson, and other members have jointly committed offences under IPC Sections 153A & B, 295A, and 505," Swamy concluded.

http://www.rediff.com/news/slide-show/slide-show-1-swamy-files-fir-against-sonia-for-targeting-hindus/20111025.htm

'A bill which incites communal strife' - Swamy's FIR against Sonia


The NAC was re-constituted in 2009 by the UPA government again under the chairmanship of Sonia Gandhi. The UPA government promptly handed over the re-drafting of the bill to the newly constituted NAC and asked it to come up with a fresh draft, Swamy added.

Swamy, thus noted, "The object of the re-drafted bill thus was the basic premise of the NAC that the majority community -- read Hindus -- are the perpetrators of communal violence in India and the minority -- read Muslims and Christians -- are the victims, clearly is incitement of religious strife."

"What is more important is to conclude is that in all cases of communal and targeted violence, dominant religious and linguistic group at the state level is always the perpetrator and the other the victims. Similarly the conclusion that the state machinery is invariably and always biased against the non-dominant group is a gross misstatement of the sincerity and commitment of millions of people who form state administration in the country," Swamy said.

"This dangerous premise is the incitement of communal strife in this bill," he added.

Image: Sonia Gandhi and NAC members have committed offences of inciting communal strife, Swamy said.

http://www.rediff.com/news/slide-show/slide-show-1-swamy-files-fir-against-sonia-for-targeting-hindus/20111025.htm

'A bill which only shows Muslims, Christians as victims, and Hindus as predators' - Swamy FIR against Sonia



"But the most vocal opposition to this draft bill came from the Muslim, Christian and so called secular quarters...who demanded that the powers of managing communal violence be vested in non-government actors and make governments and administration at all levels accountable to them for communal violence," the complaint added.

"From their (Muslims' and Christians') arguments in opposition to the draft bill, it is clear that they wanted a bill that would consider only the Christians and Muslims as the "generally targeted" victims of communal violence; and that the word 'communal violence' be re-defined in such a way that only the Muslims and Christians are treated as victims and Hindus as predators, and that the local police and administration, including the state administration, considered hand-in-glove with the perpetrators of violence," Swamy noted.

Image: Swamy in his complaint argued that the bill always indicates that the state authority and local police are hand-in-glove with the perpetrators.

http://www.rediff.com/news/slide-show/slide-show-1-swamy-files-fir-against-sonia-for-targeting-hindus/20111025.htm

Swamy files FIR against Sonia 'for targeting Hindus'


Janata Party chief Subramanian Swamy on Tuesday filed an FIR in New Delhi against United Progressive Alliance chairperson Sonia Gandhi and members of the National Advisory Council' (which is headed by Gandhi) 'for committing offences of propagating hate against the Hindu community by circulating for enacting as law a draft bill described as Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence Bill, 2011.'

In his complaint Swamy said that the 'draft bill is mischievous in content of targeting the Hindu community, malafide, unreasonable and prejudicial to public order, is apparent from the second section of explanatory note to the draft bill titled "Key Provisions of the Bill", thereby inciting crimes against the Hindu community with impunity, and thus committing offences under section 153A & B, 295A and 505(2) of the Indian Penal Code.'

Swamy noted that when the draft bill was introduced in 2005, 'it did not find much support from any of the political parties', as they felt it 'provided sweeping powers to the central government thus undermining the authority of the state governments.'

 From:

Dr Subramanian Swamy , President of Janata Party, A-77, Nizamuddin East, Sector 18, Rohini,   New Delhi-110013:                            

To:
SHO/Insp: D.P. Singh, Sector 18, Rohini, Crime Branch, New Delhi.
Re: Registering of FIR u/s 153A & B, 295A & 505(2) of Indian Penal Code. 
Dated: October 24, 2011.

1.         In public interest I am sending by Courier service a complaint in my name against Chairperson Ms.
Sonia Gandhi of National Advisory Council, which has its office at 2 Motilal Place, New Delhi-110011, Tel: 23062582, and also against unnamed other members of the said NAC for committing offences of propagating hate against the Hindu community of India by circulating for enacting as law a Draft Bill described as PREVENTION OF COMMUNAL AND TARGETED VIOLENCE BILL OF 2011. This Draft Bill has been posted on the NAC official website, is dated July 21, 2011 and sent for adoption by Parliament. That this 2011 Draft Bill is mischievous in content of targeting the Hindu community, malafide, unreasonable and prejudicial to public order, is apparent from the second section of Explanatory Note [Annexed herein] to the Draft Bill titled “Key Provisions of the Bill”, thereby inciting crimes against the Hindu community with impunity, and thus committing offences u/s 153A & B, 295A and 505(2) of the Indian Penal Code.

2.         The UPA Government in December, 2005 had introduced earlier a Draft Bill [2005] in the Parliament described as THE COMMUNAL VIOLENCE (PREVENTION, CONTROL AND REHABILITATION OF VICTIMS)  BILL (2005).

3.         The Draft Bill however did not find favour with any Party.  Leaders of several political parties felt that the Draft Bill provided sweeping powers to the Central Government thus undermining the authority of the State Governments.  But the most vocal opposition to this draft Bill came from the Muslim, Christian and so called secular quarters.  Their contention was just the opposite of what the political leaders were saying.  The view of Muslim and Christian groups was that the 2005 Draft Bill was “completely toothless”.  They demanded that the powers of managing communal violence be vested in non-government actors and make governments and administration at all levels accountable them for communal violence.

4.         The All India Christian Council was in the forefront of this campaign against the 2005 Draft Bill as being “too weak”.  In a letter written to the Prime Minister, Ms Sonia Gandhi, herself a Christian, through  the AICC had  conveyed to the PM the Christian Council concerns about the  2005 Draft Bill, and then revised the same as the 2009 Draft Bill.

5.         The Muslim bodies too joined in the protest campaign against the draft as being too weak.  They wanted provisions to make police and civil administration and state authorities “accountable” to public bodies.  The Joint Committee of Muslim Organizations for Empowerment (JCMOE) made the demand on behalf of these organizations.  JCMOE also urged the government to convene a meeting of leaders of

“targeted communities” to note their views on the Bill as follows:

“The Bill does not make police or administration or state authorities accountable and provide for timely and effective intervention by the National Human Rights Commission, if the communal violence spreads or continues for weeks, or by the Central Government under Articles 355 and 356 of the Constitution, duly modified.  On the other hand, ironically, the Bill grants more power to the local police and administration, which, more often than not acts in league with the rioters by declaring the area as ‘communally disturbed area’ JCMOE statement said.

6.         It is interesting to note that these two statements, the Muslim and the Christian, come at around the same time as though they were premeditated.  They probably were.

7.         From their arguments in opposition to the Draft Bill, it is clear that they wanted a Bill that would consider only the Christians and Muslims as the “generally targeted” victims of communal violence; and that the word ‘communal violence’ be re-defined in such a way that only the Muslims and Christians are treated as victims and Hindus as predators, and that the local police and administration, including the State administration, considered hand-in-glove with the perpetrators of violence. Hence the Bill should empower the Central Government to invoke Art. 355 and 356 of the Constitution against any state in the event of such communal violence.

8.         Since the Prevention of Communal Violence Bill (2005) does not discriminate between the perpetrators and victims of communal violence on religious grounds and also it does not envisage the State administration as committed in preventing such violence, these groups wanted the Bill to be withdrawn.

9.         The National Advisory Council  (NAC) was re-constituted in 2009 by the UPA Government again under the chairmanship of Ms. Sonia Gandhi. The UPA Government promptly handed over the re-drafting of the Bill to the newly constituted NAC and asked it to come up with a fresh draft.

10.       The basic communally provocative premise of the re-drafted Bill is that: a) there is a non-dominant group in every State in the form of religious and linguistic minority which is always a victim of violence; b) the dominant majority (usually Hindus) in the State is always the perpetrator of violence; and c) the State administration is, as a rule, biased against the non-dominant group.

11.       The object of the re-drafted Bill thus was the basic premise of the NAC that the majority community – read Hindus – are the perpetrators of communal violence in India and the minority – read Muslims and Christians – are the victims, clearly  is  incitement of religious strife.

12.       What is more important is to conclude is that in all cases of communal and targeted violence, dominant religious and linguistic group at the State level is always the perpetrator and the other the victims.  Similarly the conclusion that the State machinery is invariably and always biased against the non-dominant group is a gross misstatement of the sincerity and commitment of millions of people who form State administration in the country.

13.       This dangerous premise is the incitement of communal strife in this Bill.

14.       One can safely conclude that the script writers of this Bill are themselves blinded with religious
biases.  In India communal violence happens mostly because of politico-communal reasons.  In many instances, as documented by several Commissions of Inquiry, it is the so-called minority group that triggers the trouble.  We hence need laws that can prevent such violence irrespective of whoever perpetrates it.  To argue that since the administration is always biased in favour of the dominant group we need acts that are biased in favour of the non-dominant group is imprudent and puerile.

15.       The final Draft is available on the NAC website now.  One is not sure when the same will be placed before the Parliament.  However, a close scrutiny of the Draft is essential to understand the serious implications of and threats from it to our national integration, social harmony and Constitutional Federalism.

16.       This Bill when it becomes an Act will apply to whole country except the State of Jammu and Kashmir.  Note that J&K is one of the two States in India (excluding the North East and other tiny UTs) that has Hindus as minority – the ‘non-dominant group’ according to this Bill. Punjab is the other State where the Sikhs constitute the majority, while in the rest of the entire country it is the Hindus who constitute ‘dominant group’ and by implication the perpetrators of communal violence, according to this Draft Bill.

17.       The mischief in the drafting primarily lies in the ‘Definitions’ part contained in Art.3 of the first chapter.  Art. 3 (c ) defines Communal and Targeted Violence as under:-
“Communal and targeted violence” means and includes any act or series of acts, whether spontaneous or planned, resulting in injury or harm to the person and or property knowingly directed against any person by virtue of his or her membership of any group”.

18.       The mischief is centered round the word ‘Group’. Art 3(e) defines what constitutes a ‘Group’.
“Group” means a religious or linguistic minority, in any State in the Union of India, or Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes within the meaning of clauses of the Constitution of India;

19.       Having thus established that the individual member of the Minority community is always considered a part of the Minority group the Draft Bill goes on to add several detrimental clauses subsequently.  Art.3 (f) defines ‘Hostile environment against a group’ thus:

“Hostile environment against a group” means an intimidating or coercive environment that is created when a person belonging to any group as defined under this Act, by virtue of his or her membership of that group, is subjected to any of the following acts:

(i)                 boycott of the trade or business of such person or making it otherwise difficult for him or her to earn a living; or

(ii)               publicly humilitate such person through exclusion from public services, including education, health and transportation of any act of indignity; or

(iii)             deprive or threaten to deprive such person of his or her fundamental rights;
or,

(iv)             force such person to leave his or her home or place of ordinary residence or livlihood without his or her express consent; or

(v)               any other act, whether or not it amounts to an offence under this Act, that has the purpose or effect of creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive environment.”
Note the Clause (v) – ‘Any other act, whether or not it amounts to an offence under this Act’.  The intention here seems to be to make anything and everything an offence, even if it doesn’t come under any definition of an offence.  It is clear that the entire definition of ‘hostile environment’ is malafide.
Clause (k) defines who is a ‘victim’. Here the draft makers are very explicit:
“victim” means any person belonging to a group as defined under this Act, who has suffered physical, mental, psychological or monetary harm or harm to his or hr property as a result of the commission of any offence under this Act, and includes his or her relatives, legal guardian and legal heirs, wherever appropriate;

“Victim” can only be belonging to a ‘group’ as defined under this Act.  And the group as defined under this Act is the Minority – the ‘non-dominant group’.  That means this act will consider only the Minority as the victims.  And he or she will become a ‘victim if he or she has suffered physical, mental, psychological or monetary harm….’ Now, physical harm is measurable, mental harm is difficult to gauge, but how on earth  can anyone define ‘psychological harm’?  The Bill does not define it.  Then how can be so-called ‘psychological harm’ be one of the reasons for victimhood?

Similarly, Art. 4 (a) states as follows:

4. Knowledge. – A person is said to knowingly direct any act against a person belonging to a group by virtue of such person’s membership of that group where;

(a)    he or she means to engage in the conduct against a person he or she knows belongs to that group;

20. Art 7 of the draft Bill defines ‘sexual assault’.  It is by far the most widely covered definition that is very much needed to protect women from becoming targets of sexual violence as part of communal violence.  But against the problem is that this definition is applicable to the women belonging to Minority group and women of the Majority community cannot benefit from it.  Secondly, it also states that in a case of communal violence sex by consent also can be construed as a crime.

21.       Patriotic Indians now realize that the present draft Bill is a standing proof that neo Jinnah-ism – the belief that the minority is perpetually oppressed in India by the Hindu majority – is still poisoning our minds even today by mischievous minds..

22.       The present Draft Bill will only promote disharmony. With these kind of laws the LeTs and Hujls across the border need not have to promote terrorism in our territory anymore.  All that they need to do is to encourage a minor communal riot and they can achieve what they want – huge rift between the Majority and Minority communities.

23.       Hence, the NAC, with Ms Sonia Gandhi as Chairperson, and other members have jointly committed offences under IPC Sections 153A & B, 295A, and 505(2).

24.       It is significant that even well known persons of secular credentials have condemned this Bill as divisive. The Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Ms. J. Jayalalitha has in a Press Release dated July 29, 2011 [Annexed] has concluded that “the remedy sought [in the Draft Bill] to be provided against communal and targeted violence is worse than the disease itself”.

25.      Therefore, this complaint be taken as a basis to register an FIR and conduct investigation into the communal mentality of the NAC chairperson Ms. Sonia Gandhi and other members and take necessary action under the law to prosecute the offenders under the cited sections of the IPC.

( SUBRAMANIAN  SWAMY )


http://www.rediff.com/news/slide-show/slide-show-1-swamy-files-fir-against-sonia-for-targeting-hindus/20111025.htmhttp://www.rediff.com/news/slide-show/slide-show-1-swamy-files-fir-against-sonia-for-targeting-hindus/20111025.htm

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Justice KT Thomas opposes Communal & Targeted violence bill, Terms it ‘Divisive’


Source: News Bharati     

Former Supreme Court Justice KT ThomasChennai, October 23 : Former Supreme Court Justice KT Thomas has out-rightly rejected the proposed Communal and Targeted Violence Bill, terming it as ‘divisive and against the constitution of India’. He was addressing a symposium on the proposed ‘Communal & Targeted Violence Bill’ held in Chennai today.

Addressing the
 Advocates for Dharma in Chennai on 23 October 2011 , Justice Thomas asked, “Does this piece (of draft) deserves to be even called as a Bill ?; Yes, for convenience purpose we can use the term Bill, its merely a nomenclature , that’s all.”
He said further, “The integration is the founding stone of the Indian constitution. What was India before the Constitution? The Constitution achieved integration and the proposed Bill wanted to reverse what it achieved.”

He derided the framers of the Bill, the members of the National Advisory Council, headed by Shrimati Sonia Gandhi and said, “The framers of the proposed Bill have made their own mockery and by doing so, they have shown the world what they are!” 

He further asked, “Should we take this proposed bill seriously and debate like this? It does not deserve even to be debated and taken to be seriously.”

Justice Thomas said that the tiniest of minority in India, the Parsees, has no concern, they are assured of their individuality. Another minority is irreligious people who are seven lakhs, according to 2001 census, they are too are assured of their dignity and freedom of expression.
KT Thomas' Book

He further added, “the secularism is not related with religion. It is related to human dignity. The prevalent notion of secularism is wrongly interpreted.”

“Furthermore,” he continued, “even if the parliament passes the communal and targeted violence bill, the Supreme Court will not uphold it. It will be thrown out into a dustbin. It is in the embryo of the framers and will never see the light of the day.”
 
Justice Thomas reminded audience that, a month ago he shared the dais with RSS chief Dr. Mohan Bhagwat,and said he was a born and practicing Christian. He received several offensive mails including from one of the members of the National Advisory Council (NAC), which is headed by Sonia Gandhi. He clarified that, on the advice of his wife, he ignored the hate mail by the NAC member.


http://en.newsbharati.com//Encyc/2011/10/23/Justice-KT-Thomas-opposes-Communal---Targeted-violence-bill,-Terms-it-%E2%80%98Divisive%E2%80%99.aspx?NB=&lang=1&m1=&m2=&p1=&p2=&p3=&p4=&NewsMode=int

Hindus critical of Slovakia turning Roma into a tourist attraction


Source: News Bharati


Slovakia, October 21: Hindus have strongly criticized the reported proposal of turning Roma (Gypsy) settlement in a Slovakia town into a tourist destination.

Hindu statesman Rajan Zed, in a statement in Nevada (USA) today, said that Roma colony was not a zoo or museum and in reality was a group of homes where Roma raised their families and were entitled to their privacy like all other Slovakians.

According to reports, Mayor of Veľká Lomnica, one of the gateways to the High Tatra Mountains, has come up with this idea of bringing tourists visiting the area to the Roma settlement, which is said to be one of the poorest in the region. Mayor reportedly wants tourists be allowed to look inside the Roma houses and seeks to launch this plan in the coming summer. About 40 percent population of the town is said to be Roma.

Zed, who is President of Universal Society of Hinduism, argued that it was simply immoral, inappropriate and unacceptable. Town was attempting to manipulate the misery of Roma for mercantile greed and in the process making an entire community a laughing stock.

Rajan Zed further said that Mayor should be focusing his energies on solving the problems of the Roma residents and not making plans to showcase their poverty for selfish purposes.

Roma maltreatment incidents have been frequently popping-up in Slovakia, like erection of a wall in Ostrovany to segregate Roma, reported continual segregation of Roma children in Slovakia schools, involuntary sterilization of Roma women in the past, etc.

Slovakia and Europe needed to improve the conditions of Roma who lived in medieval squalor in mud houses without running water, gas and sewage in 21st century. Was this a part of the vision of post-Berlin Wall European Union, Zed asked.

Rajan Zed pointed out that it was appalling to see how inhumanely Europe was treating its about 15 million Roma brothers-sisters. It was clearly reprehensible, hazardous and immoral and a brazen failure of Europe to meet its international obligations. When it came to Roma, Europe frequently failed to implement its own laws distinctly mentioned in its own books.

Rajan Zed stated that apartheid conditions faced by Roma people was a social blight for Europe and the rest of the world as they reportedly regularly faced social exclusion, racism, substandard education, hostility, joblessness, rampant illness, inadequate housing, lower life expectancy, unrest, living on desperate margins, language barriers, stereotypes, mistrust, rights violations, discrimination, marginalization, appalling living conditions, prejudice, human rights abuse, racist slogans on Internet, etc.

Besides the absence of any serious efforts at their inclusion, Roma were being used as “punch bag” and blamed for the social ills of Europe and many politicians even exploited segregation to their political advantage. European neglect was trapping Roma in cycles of persecution and poverty. Roma issue should be one of the highest priorities of human rights agenda of Europe and world, thus reversing the history of persecution, Zed stressed.

Rajan Zed said that “Tatra Tiger”, one of the fastest growing economies and country of Juraj Jánošík, Slovakia should not continue staying apathetic and silent spectator ignoring Roma apartheid. It was moral obligation of Slovakia to take care of its most disadvantaged Roma population and stop human rights violations reportedly suffered by them. There are reportedly about 350,000 Roma in Slovakia. Ivan Gasparovic is President and Iveta Radicova is Prime Minister of Slovakia.

References to Roma people in Europe, who are believed to have their roots in the Indian subcontinent, reportedly went as far back as ninth century CE.

http://en.newsbharati.com//Encyc/2011/10/21/Hindus-critical-of-Slovakia-turning-Roma-into-a-tourist-attraction.aspx?NB=&lang=1&m1=&m2=&p1=&p2=&p3=&p4=&NewsMode=int

Sunday, October 16, 2011

లవ్ జిహాద్ ఒక ప్రమాదకర ఎత్తుగడ - Love Jihad Original Poster

Source : http://www.lokahitham.net/2011/10/blog-post_3923.html#more

Love Jihad Poster

గడచినా కొద్ది సంవత్సరాలుగా దేశంలోని కొన్ని ప్రాంతాల్లో 'లవ్ జిహాద్' పేరు తరచుగా వినిపిస్తోంది. ఏమిటీ ఈ లవ్ జిహాద్? ఇదేమైనా సమస్యా? దేశంలో అనేక సమస్యలున్నాయి. ఆ సమస్యల్లో ఇదొక ప్రమాదకరమైన సమస్య. ఆ సమస్య కూడా అంత త్వరగా అర్థం కానిది. సమస్యను ఎదుర్కొంటున్న వారు పరువు, మర్యాదల కోసం పదిమందిలో చెప్పుకోలేని సమస్య. ఈ సమస్య గురించి ఈ మధ్య కేరళ హైకోర్టు పోలీసు విభాగాన్ని హెచ్చరించిన విషయం పాఠకుల దృష్టికి వచ్చి ఉంటుంది.

కేరళలో గత 6 నెలలలో 4 వేల మంది అమ్మాయిలు కనిపించకుండా పోయారు. వారు ఏమయ్యారో ఎవరికీ తెలియదు. అందులో కొందరి విషయాలు వెలుగులోకి వచ్చాయి. దాని ద్వారా తెలిసినదేమంటే ప్రేమ పేరుతొ వివాహాలు చేసుకోవడం ప్రోత్సహించ బడుతున్న ముస్లిం యువకులు హిందూ ఆడపిల్లలను తీసుకెళ్ళి పెళ్ళిళ్ళు చేసుకుంటున్నట్లుగా తెలిసింది. ప్రేమ ముసుగులో అదిరించి, బెదిరించి మతం మార్చి వివాహాలు చేసుకుంటున్నారు. అట్లా చేసుకోమని యువకులకు ప్రత్యేక శిక్షణనిస్తున్నట్లుగా కూడా తెలుస్తోంది. అదే పనిగా వారికి ప్రత్యేక జీతం, అలవెన్సులు కూడా ఇస్తున్నట్లుగా వింటున్నాము.

ప్రేమ ముసుగులో జరుగుతున్నా ఈ మోసపూరిత చర్యలను హిందూ సమాజం గుర్తించాలి. ఒక వనవాసీ అమ్మాయి అనుభవం ప్రకారం - హిందూ అమ్మాయిలను ఎత్తుకుపోవడమే కాకుండా ముస్లిం అమ్మాయిలతో ఎవరైనా హిందూ యువకుడు పరిచయం చేసుకుని మాట్లాడుతుంటే అతనిని బెదిరించి మతం మార్చి, వారి అమ్మాయిలనిచ్చి నిఖా చేస్తున్నారు. ఎటు పోయినా హిందూ సమాజానికే నష్టం కలిగించే ఈ ప్రయత్న పూర్వక కార్యకలాపాల విషయంలో ప్రజలను అప్రమత్తం చేసేందుకు నవంబర్ 1 నుంచి 15 వరకు దేశమంతటా జనజాగరణ కార్యక్రమం జరగబోతున్నది. ఈ కార్యక్రమానికి అందరూ సహకరించాలని నిర్వాహకులు కోరుతున్నారు.

హిందూ వ్యతిరేక కుట్ర - మతహింస నివారణ బిల్

Source : http://www.lokahitham.net/2011/10/blog-post_5453.html

24 అక్టోబర్ సాయంత్రం 6 గంటలకు గోదావరి ఖనిలో న్యాయవాద పరిషత్ అధ్వర్యంలో మతహింస నివారణ బిల్లుపై చర్చా వేదిక జరిగింది. ఈ చర్చకు సీనియర్ న్యాయవాది శ్రీ పింగిళి విశ్వేశ్వరరావు, సింగరేణి ఎస్.ఏం.ఎస్. ప్లాంట్ అధికారి శ్రీ రాజయ్య, గోదావరి ఖని జిల్లా సంఘచాలక్ శ్రీ భగవాన్ రెడ్డి, సమాచార భారతి రాష్ట్ర కార్యదర్శి శ్రీ మల్లికార్జున్ పాల్గొన్నారు.

చర్చా వేదికలో న్యాయవాది శ్రీమతి భవానీ, ఓ.సి.సి. క్లర్క్ కమ్రోద్దీన్, కమ్యూనిస్టు నాయకుడు శ్రీ స్వామి, టంగుటూరి కొమరయ్య బి.ఏం.ఎస్., బల్సూరి అమరేందర్ రావు, ఎస్.కుమార్ బి.జె.పి. తదితరులు ప్రసంగించారు. హిందుత్వం నుండి ఎస్.సి., ఎస్.టి.లను వేరు చేయటానికి ఈ బిల్ పెద్ద కుట్ర, అంతేకాదు దేశంలో ప్రజల మధ్య వైషమ్యాలను పెంచేందుకు ఈ బిల్ తయారుచేయబడిందని, భారతీయులుగా మనం అందరం ఈ బిల్లును వ్యతిరేకించాలని పలువురు అభిప్రాయపడ్డారు.

ప్రధాన వక్త శ్రీ మల్లికార్జున్ మాట్లాడుతూ "స్వాతంత్ర్యం వచ్చిన నాటి నుండి దేశ ప్రజలను చీల్చే ప్రయత్నాలు కాంగ్రెస్ చేసుకుంటూ వస్తున్నది. ఈ దేశం పేరునే మార్చే ప్రయత్నం చేసిన ఘనత కాంగ్రెస్ కు ఉంది. రాజ్యాంగంలో ఈ దేశం పేరు ఇండియా అని వ్రాశారు. దానిపై చాలా గొడవ జరిగితే ఇండియా దటీజ్ భారత్ అని మార్చారు. వేల సంవత్సరాలుగా ఈ దేశం పేరు భారత్ అని ఉంటే ఇండియా గా మార్చాలని ఎందుకు ప్రయత్నిచారో అర్థం చేసుకోవాలి. 1990 నుండి భారత్ లో రాజకీయ పునరేకీకరణ జరగటం ప్రారంభమైంది. దాని కారణంగా కాంగ్రెస్ కష్టాలలో పడింది. ముస్లిములు, దళితులూ, గిరిజనులు కాంగ్రెస్ కు దూరమయ్యారు. వారిని మరల తన వోట్ బ్యాంకులుగా మార్చుకోవటానికి కాంగ్రెస్ మతహింస నివారణ బిల్లు తేవాలని చూస్తున్నది. మొదటి ప్రయత్నంగా సచార్ కమిటీ నివేదిక ఆధారంగా ముస్లింల కోసం అభివృద్ధి పథకాలు అమలు చేస్తున్నారు. ఈ రోజు దేశం ఎదుర్కొంటున్న కీలక సమస్యలు ఉగ్రవాదం, అవినీతి. వీటిని సమర్ధవంతంగా ఎదుర్కొనేందుకు ఏం చెయ్యాలో ఆలోచించకుండా మత ఘర్షణల నివారణకు బిల్లు తయారు చేయటంలో కాంగ్రెస్ కుట్రను అర్థం చేసుకోవాలి. క్రైస్తవ మిషనరీలు ఈ దేశాన్ని క్రైస్తవమయం చేసేందుకు చేసే కుట్రలో భాగమే ఈ మతహింస బిల్లు. దీనిని మనందరం వ్యతిరేకించాలి" అని పిలుపునిచ్చారు.

Friday, October 14, 2011

A Report on Love Jihad


Love Jihad Report

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Is there any Difference Between what Prashant Bhushan wanted and Kashmiri Terrorists demanding all these years ?

After what Prashant Bhushan said, Do you still consider him to be a Patriot?

How long we need to cope up with this kind of intellectuals who are against the integrity of India and who are hand in glove with divisive forces. These people openly dined and moved with people like Dr Fai who was an ISI agent working against India. Despite the fact these people are made because of India and Indians, they spew venom against India and working with those divisive forces who wants to split India once again.

Is there any difference between what Arundhati Roy said and Prashant Bhushan said.
Is there any difference between what  Kashmiri Terrorists demand and Prashant Bhushan's Views?
Should we still  allow him to represent us as Civil Society Member?

In response to a question, Prashant Bhushan, said that they were mulling to file a petition in Indian Supreme Court to seek punishment for the troops and police personnel involved in the killing of 118 Kashmiris in 2010. He said that the petition would also seek release of the President of High Court Bar Association of Kashmir, Mian Qayoom and General Secretary, Ghulam Nabi Shaheen.

“The cases of persons killed in custody and those who have disappeared need to be investigated and the guilty personnel must be punished,” Bhushan said. He added that they would urge the Indian government to set up a high-level judicial committee headed by Chief justice of India to probe into the arrests and killings of innocent people in Kashmir.

Prashant had reportedly said that the Kashmiri people should be given 'azadi' if they don't want to live with India. He had also reportedly recommended that withdrawl of Indian army from Kashmir.

Why should we allow such people with Patriotic Mask in the Real Patriotic Movement led By Anna Hazare???

Can you still accept him as your representative to talk to government on Jan Lokpal Bill???

Friday, October 7, 2011

Talibanic circular from Muthoot FinCorp to it's staff


Attached with this is the scanned copy of the Muthoot FinCorp circular to its employees regarding their dress code that includes strict instructions regarding not wearing bindi or sandalwood paste etc., to the office. The translation of the matter from Malayalam is as follows:

The management of Muthoot Fincorp Limited, a prominent non-banking finance company from Kerala owned by Muthoot Papachan group, has issued a Taliban model circular to their employees with strict instructions regarding their dress code in office. This has aroused severe discontent among the employees in the company. The management is still not ready to go back on this circular. The circular was first issued in March. There were many reminders since then.

The circular issued in the name of Shiney Thomas, Executive Secretary, says that visible marks such as "kuri"(sandalwood paste on the forehead), "bindi", should not be put on the forehead. The circular has been marked important and has been forwarded to the all heads of all the offices and departments for bringing into the notice of all employees. Though the circular is titled as instructions regarding dress code, it goes beyond that. The general content of the circular includes the color of the dress, the way it has to be worn, etc., just like those usually issued in all companies, but the specific instructions contain material that clearly interfere with the religious beliefs of Hindus and is more indicative of the Christian dislike for Hindu religious symbols as in all Christian missionary managed schools.

All employees, men or women, should wear no jewelry other than marriage ring, watch, and a chain. Rakhi or other types of threads have been prohibited. Applying sandalwood paste on forehead (kuri) is also prohibited. It has been specifically mentioned that women employees should not wear bindis, etc., and it has been strictly banned during office hours. Married ladies are also prohibited from wearing sindoor on their forehead.

They are also one of the prime sponsors of Delhi Daredevils, the IPL team. They have their offices across main cities across the world and in India along with small towns in Kerala. High profile murder of Paul Muthoot had hit headlines couple of years ago.

Source: Translation of Dainik Janmabhoomi, Malyalam Edition

Muthoot withdraws Talibanic circular, apologises

Source: News Bharati     

Copy of Muthoot's controversial circular

Thiruvananthpuram, October 3 : Muthoot Finance Corporation has withdrawn it’s controversial circular which banned it’s employees from following many Hindu conventions. The Controversial circular included a ban on sporting ‘Bindi’ or ‘Sindoor’ (बिन्दी /कुंकूम तीलक/ सिंदूर) which is essential to wear for every lady according to Hindu tradition. There was a huge outcry from Hindu community protesting the controversial circular as ‘Talibanic’. The circular was issued around the first week of September.
Muthoot Fin Corp has reissued circular regarding their dresscode omitting the controversial portions, in response to the stepped up the protests from Hindu organisations against the ‘Talibanic’ circular, which affected Hindu employees. The original controversial circular has been withdrawn with immediate effect.
Following compromise talks with Hindu Aikya Vedi leaders, Muthoot told the HAV leaders that the circular was not intended to hurt the sentiments of any religious group and apologised for the hurt caused.

Hindu community took protest marches to Muthoot firm offices. The Muthoot is a leading money lending group in Kerala. Their dress-code circular which warned of strict actions against it’s employees who put Bindhi or Sindhoor in forehead had invited wrath of Hindu organizations. Even Dr Subrahmanyam Swamy had warned Muthoot group of legal action. The pressure mounted from Hindu community had made the group to withdraw the circular.

Thomas John, MD of the Muthoot group, along with their legal advisors were participated with the talks with the HAV leaders. The HAV was represented by E S Biju, Brahmachari Bhargava Ram, K N Venkateswaran, Devi Das, Thirumala Anilkumar and Sandeep Thampanoor.

Don’t make Roma a ‘scapegoat’ for all ills: US Hindu Group to Europe

Source: News Bharati     

Rajan Zed
Rajan Zed

Nevada (US), October 4: A Hindu group of US has asked Europe to find another scapegoat in place of Roma (Gypsies) to blame for their ills and instead work on ending long time apartheid faced by them. Hindu statesman Rajan Zed, in a statement in Nevada (USA) on Monday, said that it was now time for Europe to move on and select scapegoat other than Roma who had held that ‘title’ for quite some time.

Referring to the recent anti-Roma movements in Bulgaria, Hungary and Czech Republic, Zed, who is president of Universal Society of Hinduism, urged immediate intervention of European Union to safeguard the Roma communities and their civil rights. All Europeans, Roma or non-Roma, should be treated fairly and should have equal access to all opportunities and privileges.

He argued that Hungary should focus on Roma upliftment programs instead blaming them for all the crime. Reported prejudices, intolerance, violence, racist overtones and hate speech against Roma in Bulgaria needed to end and instead the country should work on "inclusion" of Roma.

Roma are a subgroup of the Romani people which is an ethnic group with origins in India who are widely dispersed with their largest concentrated populations in Europe, especially Central and Eastern Europe, with more recent diaspora populations in the Americas and, to a lesser extent, in North Africa and the Middle East. Romas are also known as ‘Gypsies’, who live primarily in Central and Eastern Europe (including Italy), as well as in the Balkans and Western Anatolia, and as recent immigrants in Western Europe and the Americas. Roma is also used as a synonym for the whole Romani people.

Reported call for dismantling of Roma settlements by some groups in Bulgaria without providing them alternative accommodation was unfortunate and should be withdrawn. Politicians should not capitalize on ethnic tensions. Czech Republic needed better protection system for Roma, which reportedly saw recent marches and riots against them.

Zed commended reported call for peace and reinstatement of justice and solidarity of Bulgarian Orthodox Church and urged all religious groups and leaders in Europe to come to the rescue of Roma as religion told us to help the helpless.

He pointed out that Europe's most persecuted and discriminated community, Roma reportedly regularly encountered social exclusion, racism, substandard education, hostility, joblessness, rampant illness, inadequate housing, lower life expectancy, unrest, living on desperate margins, stereotypes, mistrust, rights violations, discrimination, marginalization, appalling living conditions, prejudice, human rights abuse, etc.

Monday, October 3, 2011

ఇస్లాంపై మారుతున్న ఐరోపా దృక్పథం

(సుధీంద్ర కులకర్ణి ఆంధ్రజ్యోతిలో వ్రాసిన వ్యాసం ఆధారంగా) 
 
 

జులై 22 న నార్వే రాజధాని "ఓస్లో" లో అండర్స్, బ్రాహింగ్ బ్రీవిక్ అనే క్రైస్తవమత అనుయాయి 77 మంది క్రైస్తవేతరులను  దారుణంగా కాల్చి చంపాడు. యూరోపియన్ సమాజం సాంస్కృతికంగా క్రైస్తవ వ్యవస్థగా ఉండిపోవాలని గట్టిగా కోరుకుంటున్న వారిలో బ్రీవిక్ ఒకరు. ఈ చర్య ప్రపంచ దేశాల సభ్య సమాజంలో ముఖ్యంగా ఐరోపా సమాజంలో దిగ్భ్రాంతి కలిగించింది. ఆందోళనకు, ఆవేదనకు గురి చేసింది. ఎందుకిలా జరిగింది? యురోపియన్లలో అంతర్మధనం మొదలైంది. దేశంలోని పరిస్థితులు ఏమిటి? ఎలా ఉండాలి? అనే అంశాలపై చర్చ జరుగుతోంది. ఓస్లోలో బాంబు దాడులు, ఊచకోతలకు పాల్పడే ముందు బ్రీవిక్ ఒక మ్యానిఫెస్టోను విడుదల చేశాడు. ఐరోపాలో ముస్లిం జనాభా పెరిగిపోతున్నది. పెరిగిపోతున్న ముస్లిం వలసలను నిలువరించటానికి నార్వే వామపక్ష ప్రభుత్వం ఎలాంటి చర్యలు చేపట్టక పోవడాన్ని ఆ మ్యానిఫెస్టో ఖండించింది. వలస వచ్చిన ముస్లింలు యూరోపియన్ సమాజంలో అంతర్భాగం కావడం లేదు. స్థానిక జాతీయతా,  సంస్కృతితో కలిసిపోకుండా ఆక్రమణ మనస్తత్వంతో తమ సొంత సంస్కృతీ సంప్రదాయాల పరిధిలోనే ఉంటున్నారు. భారతదేశంలో కూడా ఇదే పరిస్థితి నెలకొని ఉండి. ఇది ఆధునిక సమాజంలో తీవ్ర సమస్యలను సృష్టిస్తోంది. 

బహు సంస్కృతీ పరత్వం : వలస వచ్చిన వారిని సంపూర్ణంగా సంలీనం చేసుకోవడానికి వారి వారి సొంత మత విశ్వాసాలను అనుసరించడానికి పూర్తి స్వాతంత్ర్యాన్ని ఇవ్వడమే ఉత్తమమన్న లౌకిక భావన - సత్ఫలితాలను ఇవ్వడం లేదని యూరోపియన్ ప్రజలు గుర్తిస్తున్నారు. ఏంజెలా మెర్కల్ (జర్మనీ ఛాన్స్ లర్) నికోలస్ సర్కోజీ (ఫ్రాన్సు అధ్యక్షులు) డేవిడ్ కేమెరాన్ (బ్రిటన్ ప్రధాని) మొదలైన ప్రభుత్వాధినేతలే కాక యూరపులోని పలువురు రాజకీయ నాయకులూ, మేధావులు బహు సంస్కృతీ పరత్వం విఫలమైందని అంగీకరించారు. భారత దేశంలో కూడా ఈ బహు సంస్కృతీ పరత్వం, జాతీయ సమైక్యతను దృష్టిలో ఉంచుకొని రాజకీయనాయకులు, మేధావులు ఈ దిశగా ఆలోచించ వలసి ఉంది. అలాగే మీడియాలో కూడా ఈ అంశాలపై విస్తృతంగా చర్చ జరగాల్సి ఉంది.  

ఇంగ్లాండ్, అమెరికా వంటి ఇతర ఐరోపా దేశాలకు వలస వెళ్ళే ముస్లింలు మతస్వాతంత్ర్యం, సాంస్కృతిక హక్కులకై డిమాండ్ చేస్తున్నారు. మరి ముస్లిం దేశాలు తమ సమాజంలోని ముస్లిమేతరులకు ఆ హక్కులను కల్పించడానికి ఎందుకు అంగీకరించడం లేదు? ముస్లింలకు పరమ పవిత్రమైన క్షేత్రాలున్న సౌదీ అరేబియా బహు సంస్కృతీ పరత్వాన్ని అంగీకరిస్తుందా? భారతదేశం నుండి వలస వెళ్ళిన వేలాది శ్రామికులు సౌదీ అరేబియా దేశాభివృద్దికి ఎనలేని సంపదలు సృష్టిస్తున్నారు. ఐతే ఇంగ్లాండ్, అమెరికా, ఇతర ఐరోపా దేశాలలో వలెనె సౌదీ అరేబియాలోను, మరే ఇతర ముస్లిం దేశాలలోనైనా వలస కార్మికులు, ఉద్యోగులు తమ సొంత మత విశ్వాసాలను అనుసరించడానికి అనుమతిస్తారా? 

కనుక ఇస్లాం మతానుయాయులు ఇటువంటి ఆక్రమణ మనస్తత్వాన్ని వదలి, తాము వెళ్ళిన స్థానిక దేశాల జాతీయతపై విధేయత ప్రకటించి, ఆ స్థానిక సాంస్కృతిక సమాజంతో కలిసిపొతే ఎలాంటి సమస్యలు ఉత్పన్నం కావు.